American
flags hang everywhere, from the local grocery store, school or courthouse to on
a hill in the middle of the countryside, crinkling in the wind, reminding the
American people of the patriotism they should feel for their country.
This
idea of patriotism spread through the country on the morning of September 11,
2001 as people turned on their televisions to see the scene of the collapse of
the World Trade Centers played over and over again on every news station.
It
is hard for most to imagine what could motivate a person to commit suicide to
destroy a symbolic icon of another culture. It is a phenomenon explained by the terror management
theory.
The theory is based on the assumption that humans are terrorized by the thought of their own mortality and, as a result, search for ways to deny it by taking on worldviews that put meaning into their lives.
The terror management theory is studied all around the world.
View Terror Management Theory in a larger map
Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon and Tom Pyszczynski, helped come up with the theory in 1986. All three are former University of Kansas graduate students and went on to be professors at Skidmore College, the University of North Carolina and the University of Arizona.
"We
formulated two very basic questions that no one in
psychology seemed to be
addressing," said Greenberg. "Why do people desire
self-esteem? and Why do
people from different cultures so often have
a difficult time peacefully
co-existing?"
Assistant
professor Mark Landau has been studying the Terror Management Theory at KU for
two years now. He graduated from
the University of Arizona in 2007 with his Ph.D. in social psychology.
"The
basic tenor of TMT," Landau said, "is that underlying concerns with our
existential condition - in particular our awareness of the inevitability of
death - play a significant role in human affairs even though most people don't
realize that it's having any effect."
Years
after Greenberg, Solomon and Pyszcynski formulated the terror management
theory, however, it gained national attention when terrorists attacked the
World Trade Centers on September 11th.
Mark
Leary, professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke University, said that
at the time not many people knew about the theory. "Supporting data were sparse," he said, "but it was an
intriguing and ambitious effort to offer a grand theory that might explain a
great deal of human behavior."
In
2003, when the theory had gained a larger following, Greenberg, Solomon and
Pyszcynski published "In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror", a book explaining two approaches
to the terror management theory.
At the time, Americans needed a rational way to explain what the
motivations for the attacks were and the terror management theory provided
that.
The
theory is based off of the book, The Denial of Death by cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker, which is
focused around the idea that "man is able to transcend the dilemma of mortality
through heroism."
According
to the terror management theory, there are two angles of the theory based off
of Becker's initial idea that explain the actions of the attackers and the
initial reaction of the American people after the attacks.
The
first angle of the theory states that the attackers were "seeking to become
highly valued martyrs through their actions." The common eastern worldview sees martyrdom as the highest
form of heroism that would provide them with a remembrance after death.
The
terror management theory speculates that, ironically, their fear of death led
them to suicidal martyrdom as a way to be remembered after death.
In
2006, Greenberg, Solomon and Pyszczynski conducted a study that demonstrated
that Iranian college students support the idea of suicidal martyrdom if they believe
that they will forever be remembered afterwards. This study supports the terror management theory's idea that
cultural worldviews affect one's idea of death and immortality.
The
second angle to the theory explains the increase in patriotism, charitable
giving and spirituality directly after the attacks.
"The
attacks on 9/11 were powerful reminders of mortality for
Americans while also
serving as threats to the power and
righteousness of our nation," Greenberg
said.
This
angle helped terror management theorists to explain the way Americans treated
people of Middle-Eastern descent after the attacks, as well.
"I
remember hearing about a man in Texas who was killed because he was wearing a
turban and was Middle-Eastern," Landau said. "That's why the theory gained more
credence after 9/11. It showed the
same kind of symbolic defenses on a national scale as it did in the lab."
The
terror management theory, however, is not without criticism. Other social psychologists don't
resonate with the theory, saying that it takes the idea of death as a
motivation for the choices people make too far.
"The
terror management theory is very interesting and creative," said Dan Batson,
retired social psychology professor at the University of Kansas. "I'm not challenging the core motive of
the theory, I just don't think that death is the only motive influencing and
worrying people."
Leary
is another social psychologist that doesn't entirely resonate with the terror
management theory. "Because the TM
theorists and I have disagreed about these kinds of issues, some people assume
that I dislike the theory," Leary said, "but I admire its supporters, their
scholarly contributions, and the intellectual effort that they have devoted to
it. We simply disagree about whether self-esteem is fundamentally about
social rejection or death."
Evolutionary
psychology is another field that doesn't agree with the idea that the thought
of death is a motivation in our lives.
They argue that it is an evolved adaptation in humans, not a social
behavior, that causes threats to strengthen bonds with their cultural group and
reject the one that is threatening it.
"People don't realize that shit
happens--there isn't always a reason for it," Landau said. "Evolutionary psychologists argue based
on the evolutionary reasoning that people's emotions evolve for a reason and
it's not a psychological issue."
"I
think the ideas of the evolutionary psychologists who dispute the
theory are
wrong," Greenberg said. "They are based on a misunderstanding of
evolution,
psychology, the scientific method, the theory, and the research
supporting
it."
The
Terror Management Theory has been the subject of study by social psychologists
around the country for years now and hypotheses formed from the theory have
since been incorporated in the basic study of social psychology in college
curriculum.
"I
do think the terror management theory sheds a unique light on the
causes and consequences
of the 9/11 attacks," Greenberg said, "as well as many other
significant acts
of violence throughout history."
- 30 -

