« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 2007 Archives

February 22, 2007

New planning process connects Lawrence community

Lawrence is finally communicating. Vice Mayor Sue Hack said that a new approach to public planning proved successful for the Lawrence community. Planners, city commissioners, developers and citizens reacted positively to the weeklong planning session held from Jan. 31 to Feb. 6.

Hack said the process provided an opportunity for discussion between the groups, which typically do not communicate well.

“We have trust issues in this community. Developers don’t trust neighborhoods and neighborhoods don’t trust developers,” Hack said. “During meetings those people usually sit on opposite sides of the room and glare at each other.”

The design workshop, called a charrette, was held to develop a new zoning code for traditional neighborhood design. This type of development creates walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods.

Long range planner Dan Warner said the city chose to use a charrette rather than a traditional planning process to better address the contrasting opinions in the community.

“Doing it in a workshop setting like this is really what we were looking for because that really helps to create momentum and get something accomplished,” Warner said.

The design firm PlaceMakers led the charrette. Events held throughout the week included public presentations, meetings with community stakeholders and open house forums when community members could meet with consultants to discuss questions and concerns.

Charrette facilitator Jennifer Hurley said the charrette process is effective because it provides opportunities for more voices to be heard.

“People get bored and worn out in a longer, traditional process, so the general public is not participating and you have a very small minority deciding what’s happening,” Hurley said.

PlaceMakers consultant Scott Doyon said that a charrette allows citizens to take creative control.

“People do not equate zoning with any kind of emotional, warm-fuzzy experience,” Doyon said. “The beauty of a charrette is that citizens become participating authors of the code that is generated.”

Lawrence citizen Tom Worker-Braddock said he felt the charrette process encouraged community involvement more than traditional planning processes used in the past.

“It’s more informal and there are more opportunities to get involved. If you speak up and ask questions, you don’t look like the radical citizen,” Worker-Braddock said.

Laura Chaney, whose husband owns the development at 19th and Haskell, said that as a developer, she found the process simple and effective.

“What it does is take the developer, the city and the neighborhoods and put them all on the same page,” Chaney said.

One way the charrette process more effectively connects community members and promotes discussion is through its strong visual focus.

Hack said she found the charrette process appealing because of the drawings and designs produced.

“If you look at building codes they’re all words. People need pictures,” Hack said.

Doyon said the visual focus allows people to see a connection between their ideas and the decisions that are made.

“It’s very difficult for people to see a relationship between a meeting they were at and the changes that were made,” Doyon said. “One of the valuable things about the charrette process is someone can stand with a designer and say ‘no that’s not working’ and the eraser comes out, and suddenly it’s changed. People see a direct connection.”

KU art student Ned Epps attended many open house sessions to talk with consultants and view their work. Epps said he thinks the design focus of a charrette helps people better understand and appreciate the ideas of others.

“A town should reflect its people and their ideas. The drawing of ideas is really important for people to see what could be and compare it to the way things are now,” Epps said.

Doyon said the participation level throughout the week was above average, even though the process was new to the Lawrence community. He added that Lawrence’s history of civic activism greatly contributed to the charrette’s success.

“I was impressed with the level of questions people were asking. The people here have made the effort to be considerably more educated about what’s going on than a lot of other communities. I don’t think we did anything publicly that had fewer than 90 or 100 people,” Doyon said.

Planner Joe Rexwinkle said that although those who attended the charrette did not agree on everything, the event was a success.

“We got a lot of diverse comments, which makes it difficult for the consultants to come to a consensus. That’s actually a good thing because it isn’t supposed to be just one opinion,” Rexwinkle said.

Rexwinkle said that because the community reacted positively to the event, the city might hold smaller charrettes for other projects in the future.

Hack said she received positive feedback from many who attended the workshop. She said she would look forward to using the charrette process more often to encourage discussion within the Lawrence community.

“I think we had widespread acceptance and people really enjoyed the opportunity to work with really creative individuals,” Hack said. “Anytime we can get people together to share their visions is exciting.”


View the Lawrence charrette online

City Web site provides resources, saves time

One city Web site can save you trips to city hall. KUJH-TV reporter Luke Morris explains how the Web site helps the Lawrence community.






Current Lawrence Mayor Mike Amyx doesn’t miss the paper. He doesn’t like to sift through a pile of City of Lawrence documents for information like he did during his time as mayor in the 1980s.

“The piles would be up to two or two and a half inches thick every week,” Amyx said.

Now, with help from the city’s Web site, the mayor searches through a few kilobytes of documents sent to his e-mail instead of a cluster of paper.

“I’m a click away from any information that I need on a project,” Amyx said. “The citizens aren’t any farther.”

The City of Lawrence’s Web site, lawrenceks.org, provides citizens and city officers with numerous resources including city contact information, maps, zoning codes, news on current issues and more.

“Now they don't have to come to the office to get the facts and figures. It's all laid out for them on the Web site,” City of Lawrence Communications Manager Lisa Patterson said.

She said the Web site posts meeting agendas and background on issues just as the city commissioners see them. Patterson said that reports about community topics get posted to the site immediately following the meetings they’re discussed at.

This makes Lawrence Journal World city reporter Chad Lawhorn’s job much easier.

“I'm on the Web site every Tuesday night at commission meetings,” said Lawhorn. “I use my laptop and wireless internet, and look at the agenda on my computer screen while I take notes.”

Every city commissioner has the same setup in front of them at meetings.

Lawhorn said that he uses the Web page to get information at least three times daily. He frequently looks through the archived city documents on the Web site. Lawhorn said that online archiving saves him hours of searching, not to mention plenty of desk space.

“I already have too much paper on and around my desk. I don’t need any more,” said Lawhorn.

The Web site also has interactive elements. A portion of the Web site is devoted to applying for jobs. 400 to 500 people apply for jobs online monthly. Signing up for recreation classes is growing in popularity. Patterson said 53 percent of the classes’ registrations come from the Web site.

Lawrence resident Ryan Hickman enjoys the ability to pay his utility bill online.

“It’s really simple,” said Hickman. “I just sign in, and type in my credit card information, and approve it.”

At this time only credit card payments are accepted online.

Citizens not only interact through city forms. They can find the e-mail address for city officers on the Web site, and send and receive e-mail from them.

“One e-mail can go to five or six commissioners or city staff, rather than having to make five or six different phone calls,” Patterson said.

This term, Amyx’s file cabinets hold a noticeably smaller volume of paper. Amyx likes his computer.

Lawrence to gain new park at no cost

A new park is coming to northwest Lawrence. Thanks to a process called benefit district financing, the rest of the city won't have to pay a dime. Reporter Chris Bell has the story.






The city of Lawrence will gain a new park within the next couple of years. And as an added bonus, the city of Lawrence won’t have to pay for it.

Funding for the park will come from a process known as benefit district financing. The estimated $811,000 price tag for the park will be covered after the development of the park and the surrounding area is finished. The money will come from a tax applied to property around the park. The rest of the city won’t have to pay a dime.

“It’s the first time ever, I think, that the city of Lawrence will be gaining a park through benefit district financing,” Fred DeVictor, director of the Lawrence Parks and Recreation Department, said.

Benefit district financing doesn’t usually pay for parks. “That’s kind of a new concept for Lawrence,” Mark Hecker, Parks and Maintenance superintendent, said. Streets and other essential repairs often get paid for this way, Hecker said.

About 5 acres of land have been sectioned off in the Oregon Trail Addition for this park. The addition is located north of Sixth Street, close to the Kansas Highway 10 bypass. It is one of three additions that are being developed in that area. The park is part of a larger development plan that covers the entire Oregon Trail Addition. Landplan Engineering is in charge of the design and development of the park and the neighborhood that will be adjacent to it.

The park will contain playground equipment and landscaping, as well as walking paths and a pond. The pond will double as a drainage easement for storm water reclamation. The park will be accessible soon after construction is completed on the surrounding neighborhood.

The idea to build a park resulted from problems with the preliminary design of the suggested neighborhood area. The land that is currently sectioned off for the park was formerly a drainage easement used to collect excess storm water. The original plans for the neighborhood only had streets connecting through the north and south, around the easement. The addition of east and west connecting streets created a need to improve the look of the easement. Plans were then resubmitted to include the new design with a park.

Before construction can begin, a public hearing must be held to approve the area designated as the benefit district. A hearing has been scheduled at 6:35 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, during the City Commission meeting. The purpose of the hearing is to gather public opinion about the proposed park construction and to establish the benefit district that will pay for the park.

It is uncertain when construction will begin on the park, but it is estimated to begin sometime later this year. This will depend partially on the results of the public hearing scheduled for next week. The surrounding neighborhood will also be under construction but the park should be done first.

“By the time streets and sidewalks get put in, the park will be built,” Hecker said.

Code overhaul for the better?

City commissioners are working on a new development code. A consulting firm called Place-Makers came up with a new design and building code for Lawrence. The code has been the subject of several meetings and has inspired many different reactions. KUJH-TV’s Peyton Baldwin tells us the areas the city has focused on for development and community reactions to the code.

“Smart Code” - this is what city planners are calling the development code PlaceMakers is working on.

Smart is not really the word many area developers are using to describe this parallel code. Smart is not really what they call the current code for that matter.

“The current code is too complex. Even planners don’t understand it,” Thomas Howe, executive for Reece and Nichols said. “The current code is approximately 360 pages.”

Don Zimmer said he thinks the code is the commissioners’ interpretation of what a development code should be. He also thinks that city officials do not understand the code.

Zimmer, President of Kanza Properties, tried to develop in Lawrence but could never get the approval. He said it is no longer worth his time to try to develop here. A “moving target” is what he calls the biggest issue with the current code.

“Imagine that you have a teacher who tells you this is what you need to do to get an A. So you do those things but at the end of the semester he/she says ‘Oh wait, you also needed to do this, this and this.’ That is what it is like trying to get something developed under this code,” he said.

Anthony Santaularia is building luxury condos in Lawrence and disagrees with many developers about the code. He said he was able to get through the development process quickly.

“Lawrence has a high regard for their community and they do have a higher quality of standards of development. You have to bring a nice, high quality project to Lawrence,” he said.

This mix of emotions is why PlaceMakers was hired to help define Lawrence’s future growth.

Mayor Mike Amyx said the new code would only be about 80 pages and clearly lay out the developer’s responsibilities and restrictions. As he understands it, there will be specific guidelines listed and as long as a developer follows those rules then builders will receive approval.

This A-to-Z list of requirements is part of the incentive for builders to use this code. Amyx also said the code could take away some of the political aspects of developing. The “Smart Code” would allow administrative staff to approve developments. Builders would not have to go through the planning commission for approval.

Greg DiVilbiss of The Bristol Groupe said he is not in favor of replacing the current code but a parallel code would be okay. He likes the idea of the administrative staff giving approval and that the code would be clear-cut.

Howe agreed that a simpler, easy-to-follow code would be good. He does not necessarily like the idea of the “Smart Code” becoming the code developers must use for newly annexed land, though.

The decision to make the code a requirement in newly, annexed areas, such as the area south of Wakarusa, has not been decided on, Amyx said.

Zimmer thinks the proposed code is very fantasy-like. He asked how many butchers, bakers, and candlestick makers will be able to pay the price to have a shop in these areas.

“It works in Disney World, but we’re not Disney World,” he said.

Santaularia agreed that the parallel code was not a good idea for developments.

Commissioner Sue Hack would like to see the code in place and working.

“Lawrence, Kansas cannot just sit back and let all these other towns grow and develop. We have to get with it,” she said.

Hack and Amyx expected to have a copy of the code within the next few weeks. From there the commissioners would review it and get community input.

The current code took 5 years to complete and Hack says that this version cannot take that long. She hopes that, by fall, a complete parallel code would be ready for the commission to vote on.

Development code may add more recycling drop-offs

Lawrence has a problem. The problem is not the amount of recycling taking place. It is the lack of participation by residents.

The City of Lawrence does not offer free household recycling pick-up for residents. Residents can only recycle by taking recyclable goods to parking lot drop-off bins located throughout the city.

The Traditional Neighborhood Development code presented by the PlaceMakers at the city commission meeting on Feb. 6, 2007 calls for the addition of new recycling locations as the city expands. Today, only 10 locations throughout Lawrence house these parking lot bins.

Michelle Crank, waste reduction and recycling specialist for the City of Lawrence, said the city has made no final decisions about the expansion of the recycling program.

“We’re looking into increasing the areas and drop-off locations for recycling,” she said. “We want to make recycling more convenient for residents.”

Of the 10 parking lot locations in Lawrence, only one serves north Lawrence. Multiple locations along 6th and 23rd Streets serve the majority of Lawrence residents. There are no drop-offs located west of Wakarusa Drive.

An area of concern is the area bordered by 6th Street on the north, Haskell Avenue on the east, 19th Street on the south, and Iowa Street on the west. This area provides one location, the Douglas County Bank on the corner of 9th and Kentucky Streets, for residents to recycle.

For some area residents, adding drop-off locations is not their main concern. Many residents want the city to provide free curbside recycling pickup. Lawrence resident Kate Jayne says she would recycle if the city offered the free service.

“I don’t really recycle because it’s not convenient. Even if there were more locations I don’t think it would matter,” Jayne said.

Residents must also be aware of the materials they recycle. All parking lot drop-off locations accept newspaper, but cardboard can only be taken to five of the 10 locations. Plastics, glass and cans must be taken to recycling centers that are not run by the city.

Crank says city does not accept plastics at its parking lot locations because of the difficulty of packaging and preparing them for shipment. The closest plastics recycling plant is in Kansas City, Mo., making the transportation of materials uneconomical for the city.

“Trying to package plastics for shipping is almost like trying to package air,” Crank said. “It’s not the easiest thing to do.”

Residents wishing to drop off plastic items to be recycled can choose from two locations in Lawrence. Both the Wal-Mart Community Recycling Center and the 12th & Haskell Bargain Center have contracts with outside recycling services to dispose of plastic recyclables.

Rick Shears, the recycling services coordinator at Wal-Mart says that residents brought almost 5 million tons of products to the recycling center in 2005. Shears is not worried about the possibility of new drop-off locations hurting the amount of recycling Wal-Mart sees.

“The only thing that affects our business is the weather,” Shears said. “There’s plenty of recycling to go around. The new locations will get more people recycling.”

The Wal-Mart center receives no funding from the city. Wal-Mart owns the building and the equipment, while Community Living Opportunities, a non-profit organization based in Johnson County, operates the recycling center. Shears says that the center is gradually “building bridges” with the city’s recycling department.

“We are trying to keep a continuous flow of information with the city to keep each other up to date,” Shears said.

Lawrence ranks above the national average in household recycling. In order to continue this trend, residents need to consider their recycling options. While free curbside recycling is not likely, the possibility of more drop-off locations is a reality.

Cervical cancer rates in Kansas prompt activism

The number of cervical cancer cases in Kansas is encouraging one state representative to fight the problem. Her solution is applauded by some state leaders but would have a strong effect on schools around the state. KUJH-TV’s Jessica Sain-Baird tells us about the controversial bill.







Ninety-six cases of cervical cancer were reported in Kansas in 2004. A year earlier, there were 110.

It's these numbers from the Kansas Cancer Registry that have driven Rep. Delia Garcia (D-Wichita) to propose House Bill 2227, which requires a newly-approved HPV vaccination for all girls entering the sixth grade.

“I come from a family with five daughters and lots of female cousins,” she said. “I'm a huge advocate for health access and women's issues.”

Cervical cancer is the second-most common cancer of women around the world, and almost every case can be blamed on the human papillomavirus (HPV). About 75% of women will contract HPV in their lifetime.

“It's already an epidemic,” said Dr. Howard Rodenberg, Kansas Department of Health and Education director. “Some [people] don't show symptoms, and for some it progresses to cervical cancer.”

Though the Kansas Cancer Registry listed cervical cancer as only the 14th most popular cancer for women in Kansas in 2004, Rodenberg believes the vaccination warrants for several other reasons. “We need to look at this not only in death rates,” he said. “A percentage of them die, but lots of them have operations they wouldn't necessarily have.”

The bill has had barely enough support in the House Health and Human Services Committee, but Garcia's main concern is educating legislators and others affected by her bill. Even though the bill may not see the House floor this session, Garcia said she doesn't want to rush the process.

Gardasil, the only available HPV vaccination on the market, protects women against particular strands of HPV that are to blame for almost all cases of cervical cancer. It has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and is recommended for females aged nine to 26.

The vaccination requires three shots, which run at $360 for the complete set. With a vaccination requirement, however, all eligible girls should be able to receive free coverage from Vaccinations for Children, their insurance or possible federal funding, said Garcia.

Girls entering the sixth grade would be unable to enroll in school without getting the vaccination, according to Mark Desetti, Kansas National Education Assocation director of legislative and political advocacy. Religious and health concerns would be the only ways to opt out, he said.

There is some concern of requiring the vaccination in schools. According to the American College of Pediatricians Web site, demanding the HPV vaccination “trespasses on the right of parents to make medical decisions for their children as well as on the rights of the children to attend school.” However, Desetti said it is “common to use school enrollment to prevent devastating diseases.”

Texas is the only state that requires all girls entering the sixth grade to get the vaccination.

Garcia, who is also a college professor and sorority adviser, feels the situation hits too close to home to ignore. “I want to help not only my family but also the college students I work with,” she said.

For Rodenberg, support of the vaccination is equally crucial. “Am I worried that we have a tool to use against HPV and we aren't using it?” he questioned. “Yes.”

February 23, 2007

Business Owners Share Thoughts on SmartCode

Lawrence residents are not so sure about the development of SmartCode. The Code will be in the hands f the Lawrence City Commission within six weeks. KUJK-TV's Russell Davies tells us about the future of SmartCode.







Local business owners share concerns about just how wise the new SmartCode will be.

The awe of PlaceMakers’ presentation to the Lawrence City Commission on Feb. 6 has worn off. The focus is now on whether SmartCode is Lawrence’s ticket to a successful future.

“I like some of the ideas,” said Tom Wilcox, owner of Round Corner Drug at 801 Massachusetts St. “I’m just a little skeptical.”

PlaceMakers consulting firm will base the Code on the concept of Traditional Neighborhood Design. The aim of TND is to construct communities around a grid system, like downtown Lawrence. Using this concept, high density areas are made possible, allowing residents to enjoy schools, parks, and commercial districts within walking distance of their homes. This would alleviate traffic congestion and promote a walking environment around Lawrence.

“I’m all for getting rid of cars and having a walking environment,” Wilcox said. “But Americans don’t like to give up their cars.”

Traditional Neighborhood Design provides lots for small business within every community. This makes Larry Billings, owner of Lawrence Antique Mall at 830 Massachusetts St, concerned. “Downtown needs to be kept the focal point of Lawrence.” These lots could turn into glorified strip malls, which would detract from downtown.

PlaceMakers should be presenting the completed SmartCode to the Lawrence City Commission within the next six weeks, according to Mayor Mike Amyx. If the commission approves the Code it would not mean that it is mandatory. “Everything so far is up for discussion,” Amyx said.

Don Jochems, owner of Miracle Video at 1910 Haskell Ave, thinks that discussion may be as far as the SmartCode gets. “It seemed to me like another thing Lawrence will talk about and never do,” Jochems said. “But the artistic rendering was handsome.”

To slow down or not to slow down - the scoop on roundabouts and traffic circles

Roundabouts. Traffic circles. The things known as "traffic-calming devices." Both are designed to slow or direct traffic on busy streets, but do they work? Some people appreciate them, but some wish Lawrence did not have them.

First, what is a traffic circle, and how is it different from a roundabout? A traffic circle directs cars the same way as a roundabout, but it is much smaller. In Lawrence, these are usually yellow and have yellow poles around them. Roundabouts are bigger, more expensive and usually have some decoration in the middle, like flowers or plants.

Roundabouts:

Brenna Erickson lives on the 700 block of Michigan Street, right in front of a roundabout. She said, in general, she liked the roundabout.

“It works,” Erickson said. “It makes the cars slow down and makes people pay more attention to their driving.”

However, Erickson also said that the roundabout can be dangerous during the winter.

“When it’s icy, my car slides all around, and it’s hard to maneuver through it.”

Caitlin Ogren, Kansas City, Kan. senior, also lives on Michigan Street near the same roundabout. She said she would rather not have a roundabout at that location.

“I hate it,” Ogren said. “It causes more confusion than anything. I don’t really see why we need one there anyway.”

Traffic Circles:

Liz Flannery dislikes the traffic circle outside her house on the corner of 17th and Illinois streets. She said she did not know why the circle was necessary.

“I know Illinois is busy, but I never saw any problems before the circle was put in,” Flannery said. “It made me mad when they put it there, and it still makes me mad to think about it.”

The series of Illinois traffic circles are also bothersome to postal workers.

Karen McCoy delivers mail along Illinois Street and thinks the circles could cause problems at times of heavy traffic.

“When classes are out, lots of students drive through here, and I worry about it,” McCoy said. “They’re just dangerous.”

McCoy said she does not have any problems driving through the circles with her mail truck, but she would still like to see them taken out. She thinks the stop signs at each intersection are enough to keep traffic under control.

Indiana is another street in Lawrence sprinkled with traffic circles. Tom Stacy lives on the 1700 block of Indiana Street and believes the City has wasted money on the traffic circle outside his house.

“If you want to spend thousands of dollars and receive no discernable benefit, then yes, put in a traffic circle,” Stacy said.

Stacy also said that many people do not know how the circle works.

“It has successfully created lots of confused drivers,” he said. “I see people go the wrong way around it every day.”

The traffic circles on Indiana Street, according to Stacy, make the road too narrow. He said people with larger cars and SUVs have trouble driving around them because they do not have enough room. The drivers then run over the curb on their way through, he said, which ruins the curb.

Pedestrians:

How do roundabouts and traffic circles affect people on foot?

Jonathan Glauner often walks down Illinois Street, crossing the road several times near traffic circles. He said they do not bother him.

“I’ve never had a problem with them,” Glauner said. “People slow down when they go around them, and it actually gives me more time to cross the street.”

Carolyn Sears, Kansas City, Kan. senior, does not feel the same way about her walk home from class. She said she gets nervous crossing the Michigan roundabout each day.

“It scares me,” Sears said. “I never know if cars are going to keep driving on around, or stop for me.”

Rather than make a mad bolt for the other side, Sears said she frequently stands on the roundabout until all traffic has passed.

“I don’t want to risk it,” she said.

Traffic Abroad:

Is the United States the only country with a traffic-calming trend?

Lauralyn Bodle teaches Italian at the University of Kansas and has traveled several times to Europe and Central America. She said that both places have an abundance of traffic circles and roundabouts.

“They work very well,” Bodle said. “People are completely comfortable with them.”

Bodle said that she would like to see more roundabouts and traffic circles in America and here in Lawrence.

“I think the resistance to them here is ridiculous.”

Roundabouts. Traffic circles. Do they work? Some say they successfully slow traffic, and some say they successfully create traffic problems. Some find that they make life as a driver and pedestrian easier, and some find that they make everything harder.

New sewage facility entering next phase

As more people move to Lawrence it means more waste and sewage for the city to take care of. Because of this, city officials are moving ahead on the next steps for the development of a second sewage treatment plant.

The city commission will vote on Tuesday to approve the rest of the acreage for the Wakarusa Water Reclamation Facility site. The commission has already approved 50 percent of the 530 acres for the property.

“We received approval from the City Commission (Tuesday night) to proceed with a Request for Qualifications process to select a design/build team for the design and construction,” Assistant City Manager Debbie Van Saun said.

The sewage treatment plant will be built in South Lawrence a long the Wakarusa River. City officials say the new plant will be designed to handle the sewage of a growing city. They estimate Lawrence will grow to 150,000 in about 15 years.

This is a map of where the Wakarusa Water Reclamation Facility will be located. Click for a larger image.
Map: City of Lawrence

Even though sewer treatment plant officials are confident about the direction the facility is headed, there are some concerns including the estimate and who will pay for it.

Debbie said that the estimated price will continue to fluctuate as details of the project become clearer. As for who will pay for this $70 million facility, she said every user of the plant will get billed each month on their water bill.

“This is the largest capital improvement project the city of Lawrence has ever undertaken and is a multi-faceted project,” Debbie said. “Many things can affect prices: labor market, availability of contractors, price of commodities, and design. The list goes on.”

Dave said he anticipates crews to be moving dirt in fall of this year and construction beginning as early as next spring. He said he hopes everything will be finished by 2010 or 2011.

However, before construction can begin, sewage treatment plant officials have to wait on a federal permit from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE).

The NPDES (pdf) (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit is required by all facilities who wish to discharge into the waterways.

“We applied for the permit in December and it can take months before we receive it,” Dave said. “It’s a federal requirement to meet all requirements of the Cleanwater Act. This will determine the cost and design of the facility.”

Karl Mueldener, director bureau of water for KDHE, said that they are currently still working out permit details with consultants and city officials.

“This is one of the bigger projects I’ve worked on,” Karl said. “Lawrence has always had more than steady growth. That’s good because it’s growing, but the challenge is how to manage the utilities as people arrive.”

Dave said one of his main concerns is making sure they won’t have to build another facility in the near future. He said sewer treatment plants are a lot like a car, you have to maintain and operate it.

Karl said one of the many problems he sees with a big project isn’t in the construction phase, but what happens after it’s finished.

“One challenge is when you don’t build something big enough,” he said. “You put in a lot to a project and the growth is more than expected. I don’t anticipate this happening to this project.”

Dave said although they will have 530 acres, there will be some of the property left over after construction. He said that the additional land could be used for potential parks and trails or returning it to its natural habitat.

“We have a lot of opportunity to make additional use of the property,” Dave said. “We’ll look at all the options through the community and the commission on what to do with the additional property.”

Student Supports Kenyan School Girls

A small fishing village in Kenya is receiving help from Kyli Maddox, University of Kansas junior.

Maddox’s efforts are part of the Women’s Institute for Secondary Education and Research Project (WISER) with Duke University. Maddox is shooting to raise $10,000 for the project that will become the first model girls’ secondary boarding school and research center for women in Muhuru Bay, Kenya.

Maddox is currently working on planning several fundraisers. So far, fundraising plans include a Bunny Hop with the Greek community, a 5K walk with the Lawrence community, and a concession stand with high school students of Overland Park and Price Chopper, a chain supermarket.

“I’m just doing everything I can to raise as much money as I can,” Maddox said.

Maddox was first inspired for this project while working for Mother Teresa’s Sisters of Charity in Calcutta, India last summer.

It was in India that Maddox first met Andrew Cunningham, co-founder of WISER. Maddox and Cunningham immediately knew they had one thing in common: a desire to help people in Africa.

“I know it sounds silly, but its just so sad; all the awful things happening there,” Maddox said.

According to the Joint United Nations Program on HIV and AIDS, Muhuru Bay, Kenya has the highest percentage of HIV infected people in the country. It is also home to some of the highest malaria infection rates.

According to the Human Rights Watch, Muhuru Bay has some of the lowest rates for girls completion of secondary education.

“In the last 18 years not a single girl who has completed her secondary education in the Muhuru Bay school district has qualified for college entrance,” Cunningham said in an email.

He explained that since these girls aren’t likely to qualify for college, many families prefer not to pay the primary and secondary school fees and instead ensure their girls’ place as a future bride. This gender specific spiral of education deprivation and disease has led to a strong gender disparity. The ripple effects of having sick, poor, uneducated women are enormous.


WISER’s objectives are to achieve gender parity in Kenyan education, create educated and motivated leaders, foster international collaboration between United States and Kenyan students, and enrich the community.

Through the six weeks they spent together in India and a continuous flow of phone calls and emails, Maddox and Cunningham worked together to prepare Maddox for her contributing work to WISER.

Cunningham supports Maddox’s efforts. “Boy, wouldn’t it be great if you raised enough money to build a classroom and have it named after you, your school, your town,” he said.

Since starting her work with WISER, Maddox has found many other supporters including family and friends. Maddox’s mother DeeDee said, “My family has always been involved with local charities. I’m trying to influence them to expand to other regions because what is poor here is rich there.”

Another supporter, Jessica Bell, has joined Maddox in working for WISER. “I feel that the women of South Africa are treated so unfairly. When compared to men they are at a great disadvantage. I love WISER,” said Bell.

According to Cunningham, WISER has received overwhelming support in Muhuru Bay.
“Our teachers always say that, we as girls, are slow learners. This has created a gap between the teachers and the girls, and the teachers [spend] all their time on the [boys],” said Emmaqulate Oders, a community girl, in a letter to Cunningham.

Maddox is optimistic about her efforts. She believes this is her chance to give girls in Muhuru Bay some of the same opportunities she has. “Any amount of money we can raise well be good. Anything will help. From $1,000 to whatever,” Maddox said.

Virtual school student's day vastly different

It’s 10:30 a.m., and Alex Barr is just waking up for the school day; in his classroom. He shares the same morning routine as traditional high school students, but his day is completely different from other high school students.

Barr is a student in the Lawrence Virtual School, and his daily routine is unique.

From 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. he does most, if not all of his schoolwork. His teachers post his assignments online, using programs like Apex and Blackboard. The websites have all of the necessary information for his schooling. The sites have his grades, drop boxes to drop off assignments, and calendars to show the due dates of all his assignments.

At about 1 p.m., when traditional students are finishing lunch and preparing to go to their last couple classes of the day, Barr is often done with his work. From now up until about 10 p.m., he does what he wants. He sometimes does more of his work right before he goes to sleep. That is his average school day.

“You don’t need very much time to do school work,” Barr said. He said that time at a traditional school gets inflated due to a lecture and busy work. He enjoys the “laid back” style of getting his work done whenever he wants.

The students primarily interact with their teachers by e-mail, but students are their parents are supposed to participate in a phone conference with a teacher once a month.

His bedroom became his classroom with the addition of laptop computer supplied by the Lawrence School District.

Barr said he enjoys the “flexibility” as well as not wasting his time at school all day. He added that he does learn a lot. He said when he does his assigned reading, he sometimes goes online to research it further.

A couple days after his mother sent in the application, Barr heard back that he’d been accepted into the program. He then went and spoke with a counselor at the school and chose what classes he would take. On the first day of school for the Lawrence School District, Barr went to a 5-hour orientation session. At this meeting, all the virtual school’s students were taught how to use the online programs, told how the classes would work, and sent home with their laptop computer.

Teri Barr, Alex’s mother, thinks that the program is only fitted for certain students. “I think it’s a good program for Alex,” she said. “Since he’s a senior, we agreed to do it,” she said. “If he was any younger we wouldn’t have agreed to it because socializing is important.”

“He’s pretty independent and disciplined,” she said. He seems to be learning the same things, and he often talks about his Spanish class being 'intense,'” she said.

Barr’s government and economics teacher is Kim Hett, and she teaches about 70 students in the program Alex is in.

She admits the learning is different without discussions. Listening to peer’s opinions is an aspect of learning that the program is without, she said.

“We’re trying to close that gap,” Hett said. Teachers encourage online discussions between students.

Barr has a homeroom teacher, Rachel Long, who he talks with once a month with his mother. She said that social interaction was more limited, but that interaction is still present in extracurricular activities outside of school.

Long’s opinion of the student’s social interaction is shared with Virtual School Assistant Principal, Jana Lloyd. She said that the students have incredible freedom with their learning and that they still are social.

“I think there is a give and take,” Lloyd said.

Barr’s counselor at Lawrence Free State High School, his old high school, told him about Lawrence Virtual School between his sophomore and junior years of high school. He didn’t end up applying until this last summer before his senior year.

Barr’s diploma will say Lawrence Free State High School on it, and his report cards already do.

Alex Barr – student – (785)-424-3172
Teri Barr – Alex’s mother – (785)-841-1234
Kim Hett – Barr’s government and economics teacher – khett@usd497.org
Rachael Long – Barr’s math and homeroom teacher – rlong@usd497.org
Jana Lloyd – Lawrence Virtual School Assistant Principal - jlloyd@usd497.org

Design, Speedy traffic problems for residential neighborhood







The speed limit sign says 30, but 85 percent of drivers are going five or more miles over the limit. Residents are scared to leave their dogs and kids in the front yard for fear they might get hit by oncoming traffic. Mailboxes have been smashed and replaced dozens of times.

And resident Greg Robinson of Trail Road said that his junker car that he parks on the street has been hit three times since he moved there two and a half years ago. “That’s my personal ‘traffic calming device,’” said Robinson.

The phrase “traffic calming device” refers to any number of additions to a road in an attempt to slow traffic down. This includes anything from speed bumps and “speed cushions” (speed bumps with grooves cut into them for emergency vehicles) to the increasingly popular roundabout. And Trail Road needs something like that, residents argue.

This stretch of Trail Road, between Lawrence Avenue and Kasold Drive, is designated as a “collector” street, which means it’s built more as a main road instead of the residential area it runs through. The wider construction, which allows for parking on the north side, mean that drivers feel more comfortable going higher and higher speeds. Those high speeds spell trouble for the residents.

“It’s a raceway,” said Carol McCaffrey, who also lives on Trail Road. “My cat got hit out there and they didn’t even stop.”

Citizens like Robinson grew so concerned that they brought this issue to the Traffic Safety Commission during their monthly meeting earlier this month. The commission approved the measure, which sent it to the city commission. The city commission voted it down.

“The city turned it down because no one from the neighborhood showed up,” said David Hamby, chair of the Traffic Safety Commission. “I usually base my decisions based on the input of the neighbors.” He also said it’s easy for the city to turn down projects like this if no one from the community shows up to support it.

Even though residents didn’t show up to the city commission meeting, they’ve still noticed the problems. Robert Heacock has had his mailbox knocked over a few times, as well as a little tree in his yard. He says some of the speeding is probably due to students leaving Free State High School, which is nearby. Walter Wondrack, also a Trail Road resident, has had his mailbox destroyed several times as well. “I think [speeding] is an increasing problem in Lawrence,” said Wondrack. “They just drive too fast.”

Not all residents feel the same way about roundabouts or speed bumps, though. Heacock, who lived on the East Coast before moving to Lawrence, said that he’s not adverse to a roundabout. McCaffrey also agreed that something physical had to be put on the road to slow drivers down. “You can put up signs, but that’s not going to slow them,” McCaffrey said. She’s all for roundabouts and speed bumps, just as long as they’re close enough together to not let drivers speed up in between them.

Wondrack feels differently. “That’s a bunch of nonsense, I don’t know what they can do to slow people down, “ said Wondrack. “Roundabouts are nonsense. Speed bumps might work, though.”

Since the city turned down the proposal, residents are back to the beginning. They may even have to start the process of putting in a request to the Traffic Safety Commission all over again. Residents like Greg Robinson are doing what they can to help slow the traffic. Heacock even suggested watching for repeat offenders and handing their license plate numbers in to the city.

“They’ll do something,” Robinson said. “I just hope they’ll do it right.”

Harsh Winter Increases Car Problems

Drivers face harsh road conditions during winter. Snow and ice aren't the only issues drivers worry about on the road. KUJH's Bill Walberg explains more about this bumpy situation.

Aly Rodee drove her white Honda sedan down 15th Street on the way to class, until she got lost--in a line of potholes.

“I find myself getting lost in more potholes this year than last year,” Rodee said. “My car is probably going to end up in the shop.”

The last few weeks of winter have given auto shops a boost in business, according to local auto mechanics. Residents made their way to tire and auto-repair shops when the spring-like weather melted the snow and exposed the potholes last week.

Trevor Locke, a service advisor for Laird Noller Auto Dealer, has already seen an increase of customers in the service department.

“This time of year we get a lot more people in for realignment cases. People drive over the potholes and it throws their alignment off. We don’t have exact numbers right now because the season isn’t over, but the trend is definitely there,” Locke said.

Alignment issues do cause for drivers problems, but cost less than other pothole problems, like rim and tire damage. Realignment costs ranges from $40 to $70 depending on the car, but fixing or replacing a rim or tire can range from $100-$250.

Mike Grammer, the Service Manager for Don’s Auto Shop, explained that during this time of year, it just takes one pothole to cost you a lot of money.

“If you just drive over one of these at around 45 mph you could throw your steering off; bend your rim; or even pop your tire which can cost you a lot more,” Grammer said.

Grammer offered some advice to save you, the driver, some money.

“Wait until the pothole season is over in about 30-45 days and then get your alignment done.”

Lawrence residents’ pothole problems will increase in numbers because there is still a chance for snow and ice in the upcoming weeks.

Dena Mezger, the associate director for infrastructure and maintenance of public works, says the numbers will probably increase from last year.

“The number of potholes went down last year probably because it was a warm winter. This year, because we did have a major freeze, it would not surprise me if the number of potholes continue to increase,” Mezger said.

The Public Works Department is going to dent its problem with their $2.7 million budget to repave roads, clear snow and ice, and fill the potholes.

The budget is down from last year because a decrease in city revenue. Mezger says the decrease in the budget will not prevent her department from fixing the problem.

“Since we had a major freeze this year, we have to watch our budget pretty closely. Our pothole situation has been a lot worse during the past few weeks because of the weather. But if we do need more money, there should be ways to get it,” Mezger said.

Lawrence has been working on the situation since the warm weather arrived. The Public Works Department has had their workers out in force to fill the holes temporarily.

City workers, like Rupert Holliday, have been filling approximately 20 holes each day. Rupert Holliday, known as the pothole king by his coworkers, explained his daily routine.

“We clean out the holes and fill them. Then we put a ‘wacker-packer’ layer on top that should make the temporary fix last until summer. When we get to summer, we’ll put some hot mix in and permanently fix it with hot asphalt,” Holliday said.

Aly Rodee was lost in a world of potholes, but has seen progress around Lawrence and the University of Kansas campus.

“I’ve seen people put some sort of asphalt in to fill the holes. It seems to work for a while, so it’s nice for a while. The only problem is that it doesn’t last that long,” Rodee said.

Residents, like Rodee, can help out with the problem by reporting potholes on the Lawrence Public Works pothole website or by calling 832-3456.

Bike riders don't want to share the road under proposed design plan

A new development code could change the design of roads in Lawrence. The design would focus on cutting down the need for cars. The problem is, the Lawrence Bicycle Advisory Committee isn't sure it will help bike riders. KUJH-TV's Mark Dent tells us why the design could cause problems.

The doping controversy disrupting the world’s cycling community means little to Lawrence riders. They face a bigger problem: Traditional Neighborhood Design.

Members of the Lawrence Bicycle Advisory Committee said Traditional Neighborhood Design will negatively affect biking in Lawrence.

Traditional Neighborhood Design is a new Smart Code for building proposed for Lawrence by PlaceMakers. PlaceMakers is a firm that creates regulations for the proposed design style.

This design plan promotes building residential, commercial and business areas in the same neighborhood.

One of PlaceMakers’ main goals is to help people rely less on cars.

“We want people to have more choices about how they get around,” PlaceMakers representative Jennifer Hurley said. “It’s about not having to be auto dependent.”

According to Hurley, Traditional Neighborhood Design benefits bike riders. It uses narrow, two-lane roads that use on-street parking and trees on the sides of the street to slow traffic.

This design differs from how most modern roads are constructed. At a recent city commission meeting, Bill Dennis, Director of Design for PlaceMakers, used the example of Clinton Parkway. He said cars go faster than the designated 45 mph speed limit because the road is too wide and straight. Dennis said that environment isn’t safe for cyclists.

Trent McKinley, member of the Lawrence Bicycle Advisory Committee, disagreed. He said PlaceMakers’ plans of on-street parking and especially narrow, two-lane roads could make biking dangerous.

“Sharing the road with a narrow lane creates its own set of problems,” McKinley said. “If you have two cars passing one another, and you’re riding with your tires in the gutter, it just doesn’t leave a lot of room. I would be concerned about bicycles and cars sharing the same space.”

McKinley said bike lanes make narrow roads safer. According to lawrenceplanning.org, Lawrence has 11.6 miles of bike lanes. Cyclists are in favor of bike lanes because they provide protection from traffic.

But PlaceMakers is unlikely to build the lanes on its streets.

“We’re not strong proponents of bike lanes,” Hurley said. “The streets should be civilized enough and safe enough for bikes to cohabitate with cars.”

Because PlaceMakers wants bikes to share the road with cars, it does not construct bike paths in its neighborhoods either. It designs small parks ideal for walking, not biking.

“I’d rather bike on a path,” McKinley said. “I think that’s more popular. The paths oftentimes are designed to tie recreational areas together.”

If the Smart Code becomes an option for building in Lawrence, it could harm Lawrence’s reputation as a strong cycling community. In 2004, Lawrence received a bronze-level Bicycle Friendly Community award from the League of American Bicyclists. Only 44 cities have received the award.

The award is based on five categories, including engineering. To have good engineering, roads must be designed to make space for bikes. Streets built using Traditional Neighborhood Design will create less space.

That wouldn’t bode well for Lawrence. Elizabeth Preston, League of American Bicyclists Director of Communication, said the city’s engineering was already “shaky.”

Of course, Traditional Neighborhood Design might not be all negative. According to Preston, Lawrence received excellent grades in the award’s category of driver/bike rider education. Based on those grades, it shouldn’t be too hard for cars and bikes to adjust to the Smart Code.

“They have a highly advertised ‘share the road’ campaign,” she said.

The city is scheduled to make more decisions about the Smart Code in two or three weeks. PlaceMakers has already proposed using Traditional Neighborhood Design downtown, at 19th and Haskell and several other locations.

Kansas at the "forefront" of strict law

Anchor Intro: Good evening, I’m (anchor’s name) with KUJH-TV. The strictest law in the nation for historical preservation is in the state of Kansas, but maybe not for long. Now we go to Whitney Bachamp with the story.







The strictest law in the nation for historical preservation is in the state of Kansas, but maybe not for long.

The current Kansas statute 75-2724 states that any building that is within 500 feet of the historic property and within the city limits is required to go through a review process. The proposed senate Bill 155 states that any building within 250 feet is required to go through a review process, and “written notice to the state historic preservation officer and the owner of record of a historic property shall be given by the state or any political subdivision of the state.”

One of the attacks against the bill is the addition to send letters to the property owner and historic preservation officer.

“Do you realize how much money it would take to send out all of those letters? That is a foolish way to spend taxpayers’ money,” Kansas senator Marci Francisco said.

If the bill passed, 15,000 notification letters in Lawrence alone would be sent out. This is a cost that affects all Lawrence residents.

“Senate Bill 155 will place a significant financial burden on the city of Lawrence. The notice requirement does not take into account that ‘a listed property’ can be a historic district with multiple property owners,” Lawrence historic resources administrator Lynne Zollner said.

Another concern regarding the new bill is the reduction in feet required to go through a review process. “My concern is that if we reduce it to 250 feet now, will it steadily decrease every few years? Where do we draw the line?” Lawrence planning office administrator Dennis Brown said.

There are pros and cons to both bills. It is a matter of deciding which benefits the communities the most.

The advantage with the current state law is that it preserves an historic resource. However, a drawback is the additional review process any property owner within 500 feet of an historical site has to forgo for projects that require licenses or permits.

“The public at large benefits from the state preservation law. This law seeks to protect our tangible historic heritage through the review of projects that may have a significant impact on properties that have been identified as significant to local, state, or national history,” Zollner said.

An advantage with the proposed bill is that property owners in the outer 250 feet will no longer be subject to the additional level of review and no longer go through the notification requirements. On the other hand, the protection of historic resources is reduced.

Opponents of the bill have one main goal- preserving the historic site. “The law says we shouldn’t do anything that damages or destroys historic property. It is our obligation to keep laws that protects these sites. If we don’t protect them, then we’ve lost something,” said Francisco.

Without these laws protecting the historic site and the buildings that surround it, anything can potentially be built around the historic site.

“The state of Kansas is the only state in the United States that has a state law for the review of projects in the environs of listed properties. This is the forefront of the protection of historic resources in the US. If we reduce our laws, we are no longer a state that others will want to follow for historic preservation laws,” Zollner said.

Thursday was the turnaround deadline for the senate where they move bills out of their house of origin, but Bill 155 did not make it out. The bill will not die, but potentially worked into committee.

Kansas residents are encouraged to contact their state legislators to voice their opinions.

Paradise Lost

Lawrence is sprawling. But, like in most developing cities, the city management is trying to avoid ugly urban sprawl and suburbia that stretches out to the horizon.
The city commissioners brought in PlaceMakers, a group that specializes in traditional neighborhood development (http://www.placemakers.com ) to help with help. The group offers an alternative called “SmartCode” to Lawrence’s existing development code to make the city more attractive for potential residents.

“I don’t want it to be attractive,” Lin Topping, Lawrence resident, says. “I don’t need people coming in.”

Topping is one of Lawrence’s residents who is threatened by the city’s growth. An interchange needs to be built for the future of city development west of K-10, according to a memorandum from City Manager David Corliss. This interchange would take another chunk out of the Topping land at 1500 Road and K-10.

Topping is concerned not for herself, but for her father. “It is definitely his heart and soul,” she says.

The city annexed three acres from my grandfather, Topping says. They took 12 acres from my father for the interchange. The city representative said we won’t use eminent domain. Now they’re asking for 12 to 15 more acres for the same interchange.

Eminent domain is the government’s power to take private property for public use, John Solbach, Lawrence attorney at law says. The city annexes the land for various projects but must give the landowner a fair price.

Topping’s great-grandfather, James Richard Topping, homesteaded the land in 1870. It’s been passed down through her family and is now owned by her father, James Richard Topping. Lin Topping lives on the 180 acres today. The land is the site of an Underground Railroad stop. A leg of the Oregon Trail passes through it and ponds made by Topping’s great-grandfather contribute to the spillway that makes a waterfall in the wet season.

The land is not currently under the jurisdiction of the City of Lawrence, Kevin Doyle, city infrastructure and development coordinator, says. “But if the city decides to annex it, it’s not a terribly lengthy process.”

“If we can just keep it intact as long as Dad lives, so he can live out the rest of his life without seeing it chopped up,” Topping says.

Topping has seen what the use of eminent domain can do.
“There’s been a real misuse of eminent domain in the past,” Topping says. “There are a lot of farmers that are really taken advantage of by developers.”

The City of Lawrence opposes changes to the current annexation policy. The policy is an important city managing and planning tool, according to the City of Lawrence 2007 Legislative Policy statement (http://www.lawrenceks.org/legislative_policy).

Topping talks about her friend Jane Buttenhoff, maiden name Sutton, whose childhood home was on a farm in West Lawrence. The Sutton farm is now under the waters of Clinton Lake.

”They said, ‘We’re putting a lake in here and we’re going to take your property,’” Jane Buttenhoff, Overbrook resident says. “We didn’t have any option.”

The Corps of Army Engineers built Clinton Lake in the 1970s as a U.S. Government project.

The Corps told the Suttons that they couldn’t pay what it would take to replace the land, Buttenhoff said. It came down to the final offer and our choice was to take it or file a lawsuit.

The construction could not start without demolition. The Corps had to either bury or blow up all of the buildings in the area.

Some of the bridges were blown up by the demolition team, Buttenhoff said. The blasts could be seen and felt within at least a mile radius.
“They broke windows, cracked my chimney and the cows went crazy.”

Buttenhoff says that the construction traumatized the area and its residents.

Topping has a realistic outlook on city growth. She says she used to live in a suburban area and saw it grow and take over the surrounding fields.
“I understand the concept of bringing in families and development,” Topping said. ”It’s not until now that you think about the poor farmer that used to live there.”

Buttenhoff and Topping both agree on one matter regarding the government’s decision to take over private land. It’s just not something you can control.

If the city decides to use eminent domain, a legal process takes place and there can be some negotiation, but there is generally little the resident can do, Doyle says.

Beer sales at Arrrowhead raise safety concerns for MU-KU Football game

KU Athletic Department officials recently reached an agreement with the Kansas City Chiefs to move the 2007 and 2008 football games against Missouri to Arrowhead Stadium. With the move comes added concern, but not for the reasons recently discussed. KUJH's B.J. Rains tells us why.







It seems when KU officials agreed to move the football game against Missouri to Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City for the next two years, they forgot to consider one thing -- the students.

Students from both Kansas and Missouri have voiced concern over the game’s relocation in recent days, particularly regarding the safety of fans and the possibility of young adults driving on the highways back to Lawrence or Columbia after they have had too much to drink at the game.

Unlike football games in either on-campus stadium, beer will be sold during the games at Arrowhead Stadium. That change could cause some students or fans to become intoxicated before getting behind the wheel to head home.

“There really wasn't a lot of discussion about it,” said Associate Athletics Director Jim Marchiony. “Always the thought of anybody, whether it be a student or an adult, drinking and driving is a real concern. We hope that doesn't happen."

Students such as KU junior Chris Harber usually tail-gate and partake in an alcoholic beverage or two before home football games. When students go in to watch the game, they sober up because alcohol is not served inside Memorial Stadium.

“Definetely, it could be a big problem,” Harber said. “I’ve seen people drunk in the first quarter, but by the end of the game, they are completely sober and able to drive home. If they keep selling beer during the game, those people would be even drunker.”

Add in the fact that students will have to drive on a highway at night for the 45-minute drive to Lawrence or the almost two-hour drive back to Columbia, and it becomes a potentially dangerous situation.

"Obviously, anytime anyone drinks and gets behind the wheel of a car its a concern,” said Lt. John Hotz of the Missouri State Highway Patrol. “During events like that, we have officers that will do saturation patrol and look for any signs of intoxicated drivers that might be out there on the roads, but we hope the students will use good judgement.”

The agreement states that KU and Missouri will each receive a minimum of $1 million per game from the Kansas City Chiefs, but the Chiefs will receive all revenue from ticket sales, parking and concessions. That means that KU officials have no say in attempting to limit beer sales during the game, and Arrowhead officials certainly won’t stop what will be their biggest money maker.

"I don't think it would be appropriate for us to stop the sales of beer entirely because someone might drink too much,” Marchiony said. “I think the more we can do before hand to educate and warn students then the better things will be. I think we will make an effort to do that, but we certainly can't legislate that for everybody because of something that some student might do."

Missouri student Scott Hicks usually tail-gates before going to Mizzou home football games, but he won’t even go to the game at Arrowhead Stadium next season.

“It’s not worth it,” Hicks said. “Why would I want to drive almost two hours just to get drunk and then be stranded in Kansas City? I’ll admit that my friends and I probably drink too much, but we’re responsible enough to know that we are better off just staying here and watching it on TV to avoid doing something stupid.”

Hotz, a football fan who used to be stationed in Kansas City before moving to Columbia, hopes that students can enjoy the rivalry game but do so in a responsible manner.

"The important thing is, anytime your going someplace and you plan on drinking, make your decision before you start drinking about how you’re going to get home,” Hotz said. “You don't want to wait until after you've had several drinks to make a decision about how you're getting home."

Senior Secret Shoppers to Rate Kansas Stores

Business owners in Kansas will soon have a new kind of tough customer –one who’s shopping for handiness, not bargains.

The Jayhawk Center Area Agency on Aging is working on a statewide project, the Elderly Friendly Program, that would give senior citizens a chance to rate the accessibility of Kansas businesses.

The JAAA will train volunteers ages 60 and older to enter businesses as customers with a critical eye. The seniors will be on the lookout for the readability of advertisements, signs and prices on products. They will look at convenience of location and accessibility for disabilities, such as wheelchair ramps.

“I would love to see that,” said Lawrence resident Alice Norris, 66. “You can manage if you have to, but if you’re a little, old short person, it’s hard to do things like reaching things up high.”

Norris said she would also like to see improvements in business listings in the phone book. “When I’m looking for a store, it’s not where I can find it in the phone book,” she said.

Businesses have to request the service through the JAAA, but will have no idea when a secret senior shopper might be coming. Sarah Williamson, Public Relations and Marketing Supervisor for the JAAA said she hopes this will spur businesses to make improvements and be constantly aware of seniors.

If a business passes its evaluation, JAAA will present it with a certification. The business can then display a sticker that shows it is “elder friendly.” JAAA will then list the business in an Elderly Friendly Directory, which they will provide to anyone interested. If it does not pass, the JAAA will give the store tips for improvement.

Don Buschell, Manager of Hobby Lobby in Lawrence said that making his store accessible to senior citizens is a priority. “My store caters to a wide age span, but I think it is absolutely a great idea. We have wheelchairs and power doors, but we’re not sure what more seniors might need,” he said.

The United States Census Bureau shows the elderly in Kansas will soon be a force to be reckoned with. By the year 2030, people 60 years and older will make up 25 percent of the population of Kansas.

“It is clear that businesses in our state will need to address their elder friendliness if they plan to survive,” said Williamson

De Soto resident Marian Russell, 76, says she thinks somebody needs to keep tabs on how stores serve seniors. “When you get older, you sometimes feel invisible,” she said.

Change in policy causes high crime statistics

Police officers in Lawrence may have less pressure in the upcoming year. Under a new policy, the department hopes to gain more personnel. KUJH reporter Rachael Gray explains.






Kate Furst, 26, Lawrence, set her purse down for only a moment. When she reached down to grab her vintage, patent leather clutch, she felt nothing. Downtown nightclubs can be dark and crowded on Thursday nights.

Furst had no idea who stole her purse.

“I went outside and told some police officers what happened. They knew and I knew the search was pointless,” she said.

Furst didn’t file a formal report, but the incident will be recorded under a new crime report policy.

“What we’ve done is include initial reports into criminal reports,” Capt. David Cobb, informational affairs said. “Even if a person uses our services without a formal report, we record those numbers,” he said.

This change in policy caused a hike in the number of crimes reported from 2005 to 2006. The police department reported 3,000 more crimes in 2006 than 2005.

In 2005, the police reported 9,417 crimes in Lawrence. For 2006, this number rose to 12,477 reported crimes.

The dramatic increase in criminal reports is no cause for alarm, according to Cobb, informational affairs. Crime rates in Lawrence did not rise as much as the numbers reflect, he said.

Cobb said the police department seeks more funding from the state, which led to the change in reporting procedure.

“The previous numbers did not accurately reflect the amount of work the police department does,” Cobb said.

Sex crimes, battery, vandalism and larceny showed the most increase from 2005 to 2006. Victims often refuse to file a formal report when police officers arrive on the scene, but police still ensure the safety and security of these victims, Cobb said.

Police now file these reports as “call to action reports,” Capt. Dan Affalter said.

“We wanted this number to better depict how much work the officers do,” Affalter said.

The Lawrence Police Department uses both Uniform Crime Reporting and Kansas Incident Based Reporting System for statistics. The UCR statistics record only the most serious crime committed in an incident such as murder or homicide. The KIBRS statistics count all offenses occurring in a particular incident. Both figures have increased since 2005.

Sgt. Paul Fellers, internal affairs, said that many factors contribute to crime rate measurement. The police department continues to seek improved methods of tracking criminal activity, Fellers said.

He stressed the importance of citizen involvement. He said that police often rely on the public for information and leads in cases.

“Many of our successes could not be accomplished without public involvement,” Fellers said.

“Crime prevention is a community effort,” he said.

Furst got her purse back. An anonymous woman picked it up in an alley behind Massachusetts Street. The address on Furst’s driver’s license led the woman to her home.

One month’s rent money, a cell phone and antique lighter were gone.

“They left me my ID and $10,” Furst said.

City Praises Higher Number of Homeless

In 2005 the Lawrence Task Force on Homelessness released a report that stated the goal of ending chronic homelessness within the next 10 years. A recent census shows that progress is well on its way. KUJH-TV's Irina Yahknis has more on the story








“They’re good people,” Jack Stevens said about the Case Managers for the Homeless. “Not my kind of people, but I can dig ‘em.”

Jack is chronically homeless and a self-proclaimed “crime fighter.”

The Case Managers for the Homeless are a group started by the Task Force on Homeless Services which was created, alongside the Community Commission on the Homeless, by the City Commission in 2003.

Three committees and hundreds of thousands of dollars later, the city may actually be fulfilling its goal of helping the homeless, according to the new homeless census.

“Now we can tell that we’re getting results for the money that we’re spending,” Community Development Manager Margene Swarts said.

Swartz is referring to the surprising findings of the recent Lawrence survey. The 2006 census reported that Lawrence had 112 homeless inhabitants and four homeless families. A year later, case managers recorded 413 homeless and found 81 families.

So why are higher numbers of homeless a good thing?

According to Swartz, the results aren’t due to an increase of homeless citizens. Swartz blames this boost in numbers on a poor relationship between the city and the homeless in previous years.

“The homeless service providers who administered the 2005 survey report that there was extreme resistance to participating in the survey on the part of homeless individuals” according to the Housing Practitioners Panel Report on the 2005 homeless survey.

The report suggest that this “resistance” was a result of a proposal for a “homeless identification card system.” Once the homeless community heard about this idea, false rumors circulated about the mandatory wearing of “badges.”

“This distrust and fear was extended to the outreach workers and service providers who administered the survey,” the report states.

Many refused to cooperate with these workers, leading to an inaccurate census.

Since then, the case managers have strived to build a stronger, trust-based connection with the homeless.

The case managers work with these people and build up trust, Swartz said, this way they can work with the homeless to find jobs and housing.

The 2007 point-in-time count required the survey to be done in one 24-hour period. This count was held on Jan. 29. The high numbers display a willingness to comply with case managers. This year, those surveyed were more open about their personal lives, allowing case managers to make a more accurate count of families.

“I didn’t used to like the city coming around and asking questions,” said Stevens “but now, I figure it won’t hurt me much to talk for a little while about Old Jack .”

It’s not hurting Jack, but it is affecting taxpayers

This year the budget provides the Task Force with $209,000, which is $29,000 more than last year. But now that the case managers are capable of working personally with the homeless, this funding can be used more efficiently

These results will help with decisions on how money is spent. The survey recorded subpopulations such as those who are substance abusers, severely mentally ill, and victims of domestic violence.

“This will provide a significant shift in the focus of thinking and funding,” said Swartz.

The Task Force worked for two and a half years to make a final report on how the city should address the problems of homelessness. This report states the goal of “ending chronic homelessness within the next ten years.”

When asked how he felt about this goal, Jack Stevens took a puff of his wooden-tipped cigar and said, “Hell, nothing they can do will end my pursuit of the American dream.”

About February 2007

This page contains all entries posted to Multimedia Reporting (Kuhr-Volek) in February 2007. They are listed from oldest to newest.

January 2007 is the previous archive.

March 2007 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35